SquirrelMail Rocks! It is used by many students, and actually helps them with their work. SquirrelMail IS Notable!!! Please keep it. THE MODS at Wikipedia are NAZIS! -Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.179.51 ( talk) 01:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Reply No, they're just working for Microsoft and email/webmail providers so we will use their services and screw up our privacy rights! you will see the hmailServer/squirrel combination almost 70% of the time. this is what WIKI is all about - gaining FACTs - KMW IT Services LtdĪ mail program that allows you total control over all functions and aspects, how can this be in any way unnotable? Google many aspects of SMTP or mail server. stop the slanging match and point out the facts and not the reasons. I beleive that this IS notable due to the facts that cpanel use this which is traceable and on that subject we can then say that any tracable fact is a notable fact then you have more than 50 facts - this then leads to a notable page being displayed for squirrelmail irrispective of who when what and why. I dont understand why everyone is voicing their own opinions, this area is intended for the black and white yes or no to notablilty ie yes its notable due to the fact of x,y and z or no its not notable due to x,y and z this is not a slaging match or a place to be rude and insulting, we deal with computers host websites so grow up and think of facts and not excuses. LibreHealth.io LibreHealthEHR, OpenEMR, et al. As a lightweight solution for "clinic in a box" tool stacks, it gives an email and inmail capability without requiring another UI to be deployed. This XAMPP package is deployed in an estimated 68,000 individual clinics and hospitals world-wide. It is deployed with the one, only, and internationally known medical health record and practice managements systems on the planet. If Squirrelmail is about the same as a dozen other email providers then it is still notable because it a separate entity with a unique name. If Squirrelmail were a problematic provider it would still be notable. Squirrelmail is a distinct email provider and therefore is notable. What one person's notability is compared to another can have a wide variation. It is hard to prove, but if they do that to my plugins or my copy of SquirrelMail, they will be stopped.( Tokul 20:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)) Reply I am former SquirrelMail developer and I do think that Nutsmail abuses GPL. SquirrelMail 1.4.x skins can't be implemented without lots of mofications in core scripts. All features listed in their pages are provided by some SquirrelMail plugin. Theoretically scripts can function without images, but interface will look broken. Nutsmail tries to abuse GPL by linking copyrighted binary objects (images) to GPLed scripts. Yet they are trying to enforce their copyrights with images. Chris Cunningham 12:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Reply. The important thing is not to give them any free advertising. Quite a lot of weenies fail to understand what the GPL obligates one to do. In fact, such distribution implicitly licensed Nutsmail itself under the GPL. Their EULA is unenforceable because the very act of distributing a set of files which can only work with Squirrelmail means that their right to use Squirrelmail at all is revoked should they try to prevent Nutsmail's redistribution. See their EULA It can't be violation because the source and binaries are the same, so they can't not ship source to anyone they ship binaries to. It is GPL abuse and maybe even violation. Nutsmail is not "3rd party implementation of SquirrelMail".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |